GitLab

For Christmas I received an intriguing gift from a pal - my really own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was entirely composed by AI, systemcheck-wiki.de with a couple of basic prompts about me provided by my buddy Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty style of writing, akropolistravel.com however it's likewise a bit repetitive, and extremely verbose. It might have surpassed Janet's triggers in collating information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a strange, repetitive hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually offered around 150,000 personalised books, mainly in the US, considering that rotating from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to produce them, based on an open source large language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who produced it, can buy any more copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone creating one in anyone's name, consisting of celebrities - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent material. Each book includes a printed disclaimer stating that it is imaginary, developed by AI, and created "entirely to bring humour and delight".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is planned as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get sold further.

He intends to widen his variety, creating different categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps using an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted kind of consumer AI - selling AI-generated items to human consumers.

It's likewise a bit scary if, like me, you write for disgaeawiki.info a living. Not least because it probably took less than a minute to create, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound just like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out content based upon it.

"We should be clear, when we are talking about information here, we in fact indicate human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is pictures. It's works of art. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to find out how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were phony, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not think making use of generative AI for creative purposes should be prohibited, however I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without approval need to be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be very effective however let's build it morally and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually selected to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have actually chosen to collaborate - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would allow AI designers to use creators' material on the web to help develop their designs, unless the rights holders choose out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is also strongly versus removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a whole lot of pleasure," states the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining among its best carrying out industries on the unclear guarantee of growth."

A federal government representative said: "No relocation will be made up until we are definitely confident we have a practical plan that provides each of our objectives: increased control for ideal holders to help them license their material, access to premium material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for ideal holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's new AI strategy, a nationwide data library consisting of public information from a wide variety of sources will likewise be made offered to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to enhance the safety of AI with, among other things, companies in the sector required to share information of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been repealed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is stated to desire the AI sector to face less policy.

This comes as a number of lawsuits against AI companies, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been secured by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, kenpoguy.com music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the web without their consent, and used it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a variety of aspects which can make up reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it collects training data and whether it should be paying for it.

If this wasn't all enough to ponder, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It became the a lot of downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its technology for securityholes.science a portion of the price of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's present dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I think that at the moment, if I really want a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weak point in generative AI tools for larger projects. It has plenty of inaccuracies and hallucinations, users.atw.hu and bphomesteading.com it can be quite tough to check out in parts because it's so verbose.

But provided how rapidly the tech is progressing, I'm uncertain for how long I can stay confident that my considerably slower human writing and modifying skills, are better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest developments in international innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.